Channel banner for maca
Channel avatar for maca
Support climate action at all levels.

Report Postclose

Remove Postclose

Are you sure? After you remove the post, it will no longer appear in channel listings but you can access it directly. You can undo this later by clicking "approve".

Delete Postclose

Are you sure you want to delete this post? This is a permanent action and cannot be reversed.

Profile image for Bruce H Parker
Bruce H Parker
 — Analyzing climate change data (retired EE '69,'70)
4 years ago
arrow_upward1
rss_feedFollow
Bestarrow_drop_down
Profile image for sbanerji@alum.mit.edu

We are caught in the horn of a dilemma. Chinese solar panels are the lowest cost panels to generate solar power. Buying from China on one hand reduces investment costs but bolsters their solar energy business. But given the massive requirements of solar panels , the US government should support any investment in the USA to produce more solar panels. One should not await for thin films or concentrated solar (none of which have lower costs than current poly silicon solar panel ) but support a massive build up of solar power. India promises to have about 415 GW of solar installed by 2030(?) . Questionable but they are making rapid progress in attaining this goal. China is way ahead. A big problem in the US is the lack of sufficient incentives for home owners to install solar panels on roofs. I understand that some incentives are available. Utilities cannot include these costs in their rate base and moreover have to purchase surplus power from home generators at retail tariff. If utilities were allowed to finance home owners wishing to put up solar panels or set up roof top solar for retail commercial customers at no cost and allowed to include these investment costs as part of their rateable assets, they may have an incentive to promote roof top solar which has a huge potential. Instead of focusing on thin films and concentrated solar , which may be practical in tropical areas such as Morocco , where the World Bank financed a project. But I haven't seen any data on their economic efficiency. Let's get going with the technology we have . The US solar capacity addition projections as outlined in the article are pathetic. We need to adopt the Chinese industrial strategy as far as solar panels are concerned. Any innovation should be supported but let the best strategy NOT hold back what is feasible now.

1
|
reply

Delete Postclose

Are you sure you want to delete this post?