Channel banner for maca
Channel avatar for maca
Support climate action at all levels.

Report Postclose

Remove Postclose

Are you sure? After you remove the post, it will no longer appear in channel listings but you can access it directly. You can undo this later by clicking "approve".

Delete Postclose

Are you sure you want to delete this post? This is a permanent action and cannot be reversed.

HEET Gas Leaks Map

Note in the legend on the landing page saying that while the very numerous Level 3 leaks are considered non-hazardous, they collectively make up about 50% of all the leaking.  That essentially says that 50% of the gas leaks will never be fixed because it would cost too much.  Heet's approach as proven in their Framingham MA Pilot Utility Geothermal Project is to simply transition the gas company into a District Geothermal Utility and eliminate the nat. gas completely.

arrow_upward2
rss_feedFollow
Bestarrow_drop_down
Profile image for Roy Harvey

Hi Rick, The HEET map at https://www.heet.org/gas-leaks-map says that leaks must be fixed immediately or within 1-8 years, depending on severity. Could you please explain how that relates to the statement above that half of leaks will never be fixed? Is it possible that the pipes that can't be fixed affordably can be superseded by district geothermal or individual heat pumps, electric stoves, etc?

1
|
reply
Profile image for Rick Clemenzi

As best I understand, only leaks which pose a "safety hazard" must be fixed ... so far. Those Level 3 leaks are not considered safety hazards, thus they have been mostly ignored until just recently as Methane has become a real Climate Change focus. They fall into the category of "environmental hazard". With the Climate focus on Methane being dangerous from a Climate POV, they are suddenly in focus and getting attention.

1
|
reply

Delete Postclose

Are you sure you want to delete this post?